Fix ConcurrentModificationException in RecipePagingSourceFactory

It seems that it is possible to launch several coroutines on same
main thread of application. That's why it is possible to launch both
invoke and invalidate at the same time even though they are marked as
synchronized. To fix the issue this commit uses a concurrent collection
instead of synchronization.

app/src/main/java/gq/kirmanak/mealient/data/recipes/impl/RecipePagingSourceFactory.kt

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ import androidx.paging.PagingSource
 import gq.kirmanak.mealient.data.recipes.db.RecipeStorage
 import gq.kirmanak.mealient.data.recipes.db.entity.RecipeSummaryEntity
 import timber.log.Timber
+import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet
 import javax.inject.Inject
 import javax.inject.Singleton
 
@@ -11,9 +12,9 @@ import javax.inject.Singleton
 class RecipePagingSourceFactory @Inject constructor(
     private val recipeStorage: RecipeStorage
 ) : () -> PagingSource<Int, RecipeSummaryEntity> {
-    private val sources: MutableList<PagingSource<Int, RecipeSummaryEntity>> = mutableListOf()
+    private val sources: MutableSet<PagingSource<Int, RecipeSummaryEntity>> =
+        ConcurrentSkipListSet(PagingSourceComparator)
 
-    @Synchronized
     override fun invoke(): PagingSource<Int, RecipeSummaryEntity> {
         Timber.v("invoke() called")
         val newSource = recipeStorage.queryRecipes()
@@ -21,7 +22,6 @@ class RecipePagingSourceFactory @Inject constructor(
         return newSource
     }
 
-    @Synchronized
     fun invalidate() {
         Timber.v("invalidate() called")
         for (source in sources) {
@@ -31,4 +31,15 @@ class RecipePagingSourceFactory @Inject constructor(
         }
         sources.removeAll { it.invalid }
     }
+
+    private object PagingSourceComparator : Comparator<PagingSource<Int, RecipeSummaryEntity>> {
+        override fun compare(
+            left: PagingSource<Int, RecipeSummaryEntity>?,
+            right: PagingSource<Int, RecipeSummaryEntity>?
+        ): Int {
+            val leftHash = left?.hashCode() ?: 0
+            val rightHash = right?.hashCode() ?: 0
+            return leftHash - rightHash
+        }
+    }
 }