From 96add46a4d051fa6c730af91b99a5dc9ea7dd0e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Atridad Lahiji Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 16:36:16 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Typo --- src/content/posts/responsible-ai-use.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/content/posts/responsible-ai-use.md b/src/content/posts/responsible-ai-use.md index f10bc22..2133b31 100644 --- a/src/content/posts/responsible-ai-use.md +++ b/src/content/posts/responsible-ai-use.md @@ -27,4 +27,4 @@ Proponents of GenAI will go on and on about "democratizing creativity" or "lower What we're doing is fostering a culture of instant gratification and superficiality. Why bother learning to draw when you can prompt MidJourney? Why spend years perfecting your craft when a model can spit out something "good enough"? This is not progress; it's intellectual laziness on a massive scale. We are actively choosing to outsource our most human qualities to machines, which is just outright shameful. -So, no. There is no responsible AI use. Not when its very foundation is built on the stolen work of skilled individuals and not when it devalues the very essence of human creativity. \ No newline at end of file +So, no. There is no responsible AI use. Not when its very foundation is built on the stolen work of skilled individuals and definitely not when it devalues the very essence of human creativity. \ No newline at end of file